-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Jan 11, 2011, at 07:40 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Am 11.01.2011 16:20, schrieb Barry Warsaw: >> Sure. I think it's fine to JFDI for trivial patches. After all, we have a >> version control system and post-commit notifications with diffs. I don't >> think you even need to do a merge proposal for those. > >I agree -- in fact that's what I've been doing all the time except for the >new font-lock faces. Me too. >> Yep, behavior changes should require a higher barrier. A discussion on this >> mailing list would always be good (before, during, or after merge proposal is >> submitted). > >Not sure if you and Andreas agree what a "fundamental change" or "behavior >change" is. Oh that's easy. If it would confuse me or Guido, it counts. :) - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNLJkWAAoJEBJutWOnSwa/AUgP/3ThvROSuJoJkSJaZSuaX9zc 2RZM6grqDKgokLKK3xsnHFGEryJHFBL1IPxmi572FDmm2hHJII0eiR03ROfYr5bS FTN90L0aY0GbWvuJypuVGCYh3L/pGzxA9Ho6QrG3cpM18lb9q3onvlNwdOCjYtVb hTZ2+UQuCBVSk5reeDGjodk99j79CZPrI5Vucy2NnCQIhDTN9IHg5HxOSdUlu79r ivn+9LiLLdWbviNb9RVXS7cCfA6Txd3lOKjdISRAnEV+LQQ3ngaG+VI8M9xDICsw wcoblWpfkT4ntdju0otzL/hTHxR4hW53puj2b63Ictr7EFGC0AEV7mqIDtLxNvSA kLhvURDI/D+zq0cgCB0RGCIxhv0ydFfBANFB1IsIg4yyMaal7u90Kr2jHKjabnhR fg2rfFlwNT/xdF2YHO6sq9ZgNMljzcvEbh0R/z594DTYdvRpK73/og3DLERG3d5G 3g8fCurtqxzQ8RPoi3egN4s0FxZex9A9JMQcqJ//3ym/9+DlUOAFsdOnfFs2HPho f6DBWTOoPi3OD4Aicx/BjysAoaFE0fMYkmA3erwE3N/l6laLMZf8Aj6tX6N5qp10 o5VP0f3N3x2Zy6TwgqYSKZo2Q5a7OGE1CPbWom4TbwGUNilYEBWnus31rVQebLVW sBhf958bgyBG6YbTPgbb =x1ne -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-mode mailing list Python-mode@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode
