On 11/05/2011 04:56 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
Hi Fabian,
while hunting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-mode/+bug/886227
consider a merge of some parts of your python.el
Completion feels faster than the stand-alone solution used several
commits before.
Curious to know the reasons, should you can tell.
Just to drop you a notice so far.
Best regards,
Andreas
--
https://launchpad.net/python-mode
https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/
Hi Andreas,
I myself use ropemacs for autocompletion, integrating it is really
simple and the extra setup is worth it.
For now, I'm not planning to implement that directly into python.el, as
I want to keep it simple. I acknowledge that the default completion
machinery is not that good but it's good enough than if you have nothing
else.
With that said, I think it's cool trying to enable pymacs and fallback
if not available anyways, so nice work there.
BTW I appreciate for keeping me updated with this kind of stuff, and I
apologize for the delay on the reply.
PS: with regards completion, my python.el uses the interactive shell by
querying completions with the code defined in
python-shell-completion-string-code. It's not the cleaner way to do it,
but it does it's job. The problem with this is that it breaks if you are
working on the comint shell and you have a sentence split in several
lines. My plan is to give the comint shell the ability to handle raw
tabs like it would in term (M-x term), this way I can let readline to do
it's job and then parse the result. I was halfway through a hack for it
but never got time to complete it, I'll let you know if I finish it
sometime, might be a good alternative, who knows :)
_______________________________________________
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode
