Dear Scott, Chris, and DPMT, On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:44:47PM +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote: > You are correct to include the copyright notice and license from src/ > css_parser/version.py in your debian/copyright. It does, however, seem > unlikley there there is anything actually copyrightable in that file. You > might want to take that up with upstream. >
Thank you for reviewing and accepting python-css-parser. I agree, version.py does not seem to meet the minimum standard for originality. Do you mean I should ask upstream to drop their copyright header for that file, or something else? Examining the upstream git project (rather than the release tarballs from PyPI) reveals many commits from Kovid Goyal and Francesco Martini, plus COPYING (GPL-3+), COPYING.LESSER (LGPL-3+), and CSSUTILS_README.txt. If you'd like I could extend the Comment sections, saying something about git committers, and elaborating on the "Author: Various People" and "Author-email: [email protected]" that upstream moved to in this commit: https://github.com/ebook-utils/css-parser/commit/555805e58889bb0818b6684f5092612600288d7c Alternatively, would you like to me ask upstream to document their copyright holders? ;-) Sincerely, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
