Le 03/01/2019 à 20:53, Alexis Murzeau a écrit (before Buster going stable) : > Hi, > > Le 15/12/2018 à 10:08, Alexis Murzeau a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Have you got a chance to check the PR [0] ? >> The python transition is done now, but I'm not sure we have the time to >> complete pycryptodomex and pycrytodome transition before the freeze. (Or >> the transition freeze is only blocking any new transition ?) >> >> What do you think ? >> >> [0] >> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pycryptodome/merge_requests/1 >> >> Thanks :) >> >
Hi, Now that python3-pycrytodome binary package is in stable, I'm not sure what's the best way to introduce pycryptodome python module. (as opposed to pycrytodomex python module which is the module inside the pythonX-cryptodome package) As the Streamlink package maintainer, I'm now needing more that pycrotodome python module as the new upstream streamlink now use a python module Crypto.Util.Padding which is only in pycrytodome and not in PyCrypto. For the time being, I can just workaround this with a patch, but that's suboptimal and not future proof in case more stuff is grabbed from pycryptodome that doesn't exist in PyCrypto. I can help with a patch when the direction to go to introduce pycrytodome python module is defined. The merge request is still there in any case. -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
