Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:02:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#472043: python-scipy: ftbfs with
python-central 0.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #472043,
regarding python-scipy: ftbfs with python-central 0.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
472043: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472043
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-scipy
Version: 0.6.0-10
Severity: serious
Usertags: ftbfs-new-pycentral
python-central 0.6 uses now a package and tool independent directory
to store the architecture independent files. Files which were located
in /usr/share/pycentral/site-packages/<package> are now located in
/usr/share/pyshared. Your package apparently hardcodes the former
location in some places. Please fix the packaging to work with the new
file locations.
Please ask for help by email or irc, or state if NMUs are welcome to
fix this report.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> > Thanks for the bug report. Could you please specify in more details
> > what is wrong? The 0.6.0-10 version fixed exactly the problem you
> > are reporting, so as far as I know, all is fine now with python-scipy.
> >
> > According to the build logs:
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=python-scipy
> >
> > It builds just fine on all architectures where the actual built has
> occured.
>
> This is what I think happened: doko did the check 1-2 days ago (with
> the bugged source package, I'd say -9) but reported only today (so the
> pkg version is -10, the one that fixed the FTBFS). Hence, I think this
> bug report can be closed. Correct me if I'm wrong ;)
I think you are right, because the package -10 is in the archive and
it works on all my systems, so I am closing this bug. Feel free to
reopen
it if you disagree.
Ondrej
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
