Your message dated Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:41:53 +0100
with message-id <aanlktikyqub6ji0ntqexj=o0fslzi7euaru-dxogd...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#605365: Bug#605365: Bug#605365:
pyopenssl: Use dh_python2 instead of dh_pysupport
has caused the Debian Bug report #605365,
regarding pyopenssl: Use dh_python2 instead of dh_pysupport
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
605365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pyopenssl
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch
I notice that this is not going to be interesting for you in squeeze, but I
just applied this change in Ubuntu and thought you might want to the same as
soon as squeeze+1 is open for development.
Background:
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org/msg06566.html
*** /tmp/tmpgulDSB
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
* Rebuild with Python2.7.
* debian/rules: change dh_pysupport to dh_python2.
* debian/control: Removed python-support from Build-Depends.
We thought you might be interested in doing the same.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers natty
APT policy: (500, 'natty')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-6-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -u pyopenssl-0.10/debian/changelog pyopenssl-0.10/debian/changelog
diff -u pyopenssl-0.10/debian/control pyopenssl-0.10/debian/control
--- pyopenssl-0.10/debian/control
+++ pyopenssl-0.10/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team <python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Uploaders: Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), python-all-dev (>= 2.5.4-1~), python-all-dbg (>= 2.5.4-1~), python-support (>= 0.6.4), libssl-dev (>= 0.9.8), dpatch, tex4ht, w3m, texlive-latex-base, texlive-latex-recommended
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), python-all-dev (>= 2.5.4-1~), python-all-dbg (>= 2.5.4-1~), libssl-dev (>= 0.9.8), dpatch, tex4ht, w3m, texlive-latex-base, texlive-latex-recommended
Standards-Version: 3.8.4
Homepage: http://pyopenssl.sourceforge.net/
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/pyopenssl/trunk/
diff -u pyopenssl-0.10/debian/rules pyopenssl-0.10/debian/rules
--- pyopenssl-0.10/debian/rules
+++ pyopenssl-0.10/debian/rules
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog -i
dh_compress -i
dh_fixperms -i
- dh_pysupport -i
+ dh_python2 -i
dh_installdeb -i
dh_gencontrol -i
dh_md5sums -i
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
ln -s python-openssl debian/python-openssl-dbg/usr/share/doc/python-openssl-dbg
dh_compress -a
dh_fixperms -a
- dh_pysupport -a
+ dh_python2 -a
dh_makeshlibs -a
dh_installdeb -a
dh_shlibdeps -a
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 17:30, Daniel Holbach <daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Am 29.11.2010 17:14, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>> On Monday, November 29, 2010 09:42:55 am Daniel Holbach wrote:
>>> The way I understood
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org/msg06566.html
>>> was that the idea was to move away from dh_pysupport in favour of
>>> dh_python2.
>>>
>>> As pyopenssl needed a rebuild in Ubuntu in order to give us OpenSSL for
>>> 2.7 (I needed it for a papyon build), I thought I'd make the change in
>>> the same upload and forward the changes to you.
>>
>> In general, this is the plan, but it's really up to package maintainers to
>> decide when and if to make the move.
>
> Again: the way I understood this was that it was the general plan and
> that only getting squeeze released was blocking the move to dh_python2.
>
> I wasn't telling any package maintainer when to do the move, I proposed
> this as a wishlist bug and even mentioned that now might not be the
> right time.
>
>
>> I'm sure you were just trying to do the right thing by the change and by
>> forwarding it to Debian, but I think it is inappropriate to make fundamental
>> changes in a package build system without coordinating with Debian in advance
>> and I don't understand why you did it in this case? It was completely
>> unnecessary to solve the problem you were dealing with.
>
> Maybe we can separate the two discussions right now. If it's totally not
> the way to go for pyopenssl and wrong to do it, I guess the bug needs to
> be closed.
doing it now.
> In a separate thread, I'd still like to understand why (apart
> from the maintainer's choice) it's wrong to use dh_python2.
because you introduced a delta between ubuntu and debian for
absolutely no reason.
And mainly, because progress should be pursued in Debian first, and so
Ubuntu will have it "for free" (instead the other way around). Ubuntu
people tend to keep forgetting this: dedicate your time to make Debian
a great distro, and Ubuntu will follow.
Goodbye.
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
