retitle 643990 python-docutils: inconsistent names of rst2*tex scripts
forwarded 643990 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3419937&group_id=38414&atid=422030
severity 643990 minor
tags 643990 + confirmed
thanks

* Juhapekka Tolvanen <[email protected]>, 2011-10-01, 16:43:
When I see command name "rst2latex", I understand immediately, that it takes RST-code and outputs LaTeX-code. It just follows common naming convention of command line Unix-programs. It is so common that even Jargon File knows about it:

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/0/infix-2.html

And that's fine: rst2latex really works exactly as its name suggests.

Then comes command line program called "rst2xetex". That name suggests, it takes RST-code as its input and outputs Plain TeX -code suitable for TeX-engine called XeTeX. Bzzz! Wrong! It's man page says:

rst2xetex - convert reST documents to XeLateX

What the hell? If it outputs LaTeX-code suitable for XeLaTeX, why its name is "rst2xetex" and not "rst2xelatex", then? If I write LaTeX-code that is compiled with TeX-engine called XeTeX, then I compile it with command xelatex, and not xetex.

That is totally stupid inconsistency. What the hell is going in the twisted minds of developers of python-docutils?

I forwarded your bug report to upstream developers.

Next time, please formulate your compliant in such a way, that I can point them directly to the bug report without being embarrassed. Just because you're not completely happy about the software they wrote, doesn't mean that they don't deserve a little bit of respect.

Thanks in advance.

BTW who writes Plain TeX -code, anyway, when we have LaTeX and ConTeXt?

Take me for instance.

--
Jakub Wilk



_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

Reply via email to