Hi Paul, and thanks for your review. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Paul Richards Tagliamonte <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy, Maintainer, > > Can you please verify: > > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\we~cybrowser\jquery.min.js
If I remember correctly, it's OK to ship jquery.min.js in *source* packages (i.e. qt4-x11 has the same example written in C++ in the tarball). In binary packages, we replace it with a symlink to a version from libjs-jquery package. > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\xm~rns\schema\schema_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\wi~tooltips\tooltips_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\wi~esheet\stylesheet_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\we~eviewer\ui_previewer.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\we~tor\formextractor_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\we~ncybrowser\jquery_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\we~mtraversal\ui_window.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\tools\i18n\i18n_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\to~r\customcompleter_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\ri~textedit\textedit_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\qtdemo\qtdemo_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\pa~gviewer\svgviewer_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\pa~wing\basicdrawing_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\op~textures\textures_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\mainwindows\sdi\sdi_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\mainwindows\mdi\mdi_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\ma~dgets\dockwidgets_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\ma~ation\application_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\it~sheet\spreadsheet_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\it~l\simpletreemodel_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\it~ews\puzzle\puzzle_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\it~xelator\pixelator_rc.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\it~emodel\ui_mainwindow.py > PyQt-gpl-5.0\examples\it~editabletreemodel_rc.py > > (and the rest of the _rc.py files) > > > has source attached? a quick reply showing what's creating these in the source > tree would be nice! These were generated from .qrc files (i.e. examples/xmlpatterns/schema/schema.qrc) using pyrcc5 tool (source for which is also included). > Also, the d/copyright is out of date. Huge amounts of code is GPL-3 only, > it'd be nice to fix this in future revisions. I also notice some LGPL 2.1, > going through the source again would be nice :) Should be fixed in SVN now. It will be of course a good idea to port the copyright to DEP-5, but that will require all previous packaging contributors to confirm their license, which is not something I want to do now. -- Dmitry Shachnev _______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
