On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 12:12:57PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: > Source: basemap > Version: 1.0.3+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: jessie sid > User: [email protected] > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > > Relevant part (hopefully): > > Removing > > /«BUILDDIR»/basemap-1.0.3+dfsg/debian/python-mpltoolkits.basemap/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/basemap-1.0.3.egg-info > > Writing > > /«BUILDDIR»/basemap-1.0.3+dfsg/debian/python-mpltoolkits.basemap/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/basemap-1.0.3.egg-info > > running install_clib > > customize UnixCCompiler > > [103806 refs] > > dh_numpy > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/«BUILDDIR»/basemap-1.0.3+dfsg' > > dh_install > > dh_installdocs > > debian/rules override_dh_sphinxdoc > > make[1]: Entering directory `/«BUILDDIR»/basemap-1.0.3+dfsg' > > dh_sphinxdoc -i > > dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found > > make[1]: *** [override_dh_sphinxdoc] Error 2
Helo David, I just tried to build this package with pbuilder and there was no problem. So maybe it was a python issue which was fixed in the meantime. So I have a suggestion if it makes sense: when you do an archive rebuild, check whether previously failing packages now build, and whether the corresponding bug was closed. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. _______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
