On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 22:52:45 +0100 Colin Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 02:38:24PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > I backported and uploaded electrum (a lightweight bitcoin client) > > and its associated dependencies (six, python-ecdsa, slowaes) to > > wheezy-backports. It was a straight-forward backport with no > > packaging changes. > > You versioned your six package "1.6.1-2~bpo70+1", while the version in > testing/unstable is "1.6.1-1". This is unconventional - backports is > supposed to be << testing so that upgrades work properly. Can you > make sure that you get this right for the next time? Sorry, that was a mistake; I should've been using dch --bpo instead of doing stuff manually. I can fix it if the ftp master rejects them, or I can just do it the next time the packages are updated. > > > If you have any concerns, notice any bugs, would prefer to maintain > > the wheezy backport for your packages yourself, etc, just let me > > know. > > I don't mind that much, although it's very little work for me to > maintain the wheezy backport for six as well as the main packaging so > I'd be happy to take it over once the version in testing/unstable > exceeds 1.6.1-2, if that's OK with you. > Sure, that would be fine with me. _______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
