On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:09:00PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote:
> >> So, you could try to build the version currently in sid, against sid. If
> >> it FTBFS you can file an RC bug and force the maintainer to fix it. :p
> >
> > I admit I do not understand this hint, sorry.
>
> If you look at the "Logs" column of the table linked above, it says "no logs"
> for arch:all and arch:amd64. This means the DD built these locally and
> uploaded the binaries, the buildds did not build for these architectures.
>
> Since your error is in generating the documentation, there might be an
> inherent problem with building that documentation, that was obscured on the
> DD's own machine. (Maybe missing B-D). I was suggesting that you try the
> build against sid, to check that if this is the case. If so (i.e. it FTBFS),
> then it needs a RC bug filed against it. If not, then my hint here isn't
> useful.
I can confirm that matplotlib builds fine in an unstable chroot
and I can not see any reason for a bug report.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
