On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 16:51, Pepijn de Vos <pepijnde...@gmail.com> wrote: > No explanation, but this is one aspect of "pythonic" that has been bothering > me of late. > > The general consensus is that you should use duck typing, and in general not > have items of a different type in one place. > > So the "pythonic" solution would be to have getslice, I would think, but if > that is not available, the "pythonic" thing to do is something like: > > try: > foo.slicy_thing() > except TypeError: > foo.number_thing() > > IMO, exceptions are for exceptional occasions, not for disguised if > statements. But, that's the way Python seems to work.
I'm not sure what you're getting at here, but I'm pretty sure having an isinstance() call here and there is perfectly Pythonic. Look Before You Leap has its place, just like Easier to Ask Forgiveness than Permission. I googled and annotated the source a bit and found mailing list threads from when it was deprecated, but there was no clear rationale. Still, it's been deprecated a long time, this happened in July 2000, so the feeling that this is something recent isn't really justified. Also, since __getitem__() could just as easily return a sequence as a single item, it seems like there isn't really much point to having separate things for this, and I find the solution with passing slice() objects to __getitem__() quite elegant. Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Python-nl mailing list Python-nl@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-nl
