On Monday 23 November 2009 11:36:38 Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: > Alexandre Fayolle wrote: > > Therefore, imo it deserves an Error. > > But it is no error. It is perfectly legal to implement `__pos__()` in a > way that makes sense to call it repeatedly.
hmmm > Even to implement that two > successive calls increment something to mimic some C++ behaviour. Butt > ugly, but legal. __pos__ with side effects. Urgh! If you're seeing false positives with this check, you're going to disable it anyway (either locally or globally in your project), so I don't think it is really an issue, and I'd rather have a loud complain discouraging Python newbies from using the construct. There are already legal constructs which trigger Errors in Pylint: class Foo: def __init__(self): setattr(self, 'bar', 1) print self.bar # <- Error -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France) Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services Informatique scientifique: http://www.logilab.fr/science _______________________________________________ Python-Projects mailing list Python-Projects@lists.logilab.org http://lists.logilab.org/mailman/listinfo/python-projects