On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:44:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Sylvain Thénault < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > that would be better indeed, so we could use our review process to comment > > on your patch. On your side you could use either mq or pyves' > > evolve/obsolete > > extensions (http://hg-lab.logilab.org/doc/mutable-history/html/). If you > > don't > > know mq, go straitght to evolve/obsolete which are the future way to go! > > > > If that's to much burden, we can still work with patches sent through > > email ;) > > > Maybe you could read the plain patch while I try to work those out ;-)
Are you aware of the patchbomb extension ? It's very handy to email patch to people. Inlining patch in the message allow easy comment of them. -- Pierre-Yves David http://www.logilab.fr/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Projects mailing list [email protected] http://lists.logilab.org/mailman/listinfo/python-projects
