On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Sylvain Thénault
<sylvain.thena...@logilab.fr> wrote:
> On 09 avril 11:22, Torsten Marek wrote:
>> Will do. I have a couple other things that I need to take care of on the
>> weekend. Internally, our release maintainer will start a new qualification
>> run soon so I expect a couple other bugs to be uncovered.
>
> as this been fixed?

Yes, it has been fixed.

> Anyway, here is the list of things I would like to be done before release:
>
> * 
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/pull-request/100/add-ignored-modules-option-to-type-checker/diff
>
>   this PR attempt to fix pb with recent numpy (>1.7). While I'm not keen on 
> this
>   option, a lot of people are waiting for a fix to the underlying issue
>
> * https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/134/test-failures
>
>   a few python 2.6 failures. Anyone with a 2.6 environment accessible to work 
> on
>   this ?


I'll have a look.


> * https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/122/traceback-on-shared-objects
>   
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/185/pylint-tries-to-lint-c-extensions
>   this is weird and probably easy to fix
>
> * 
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/78/false-positive-unused-import-when-using
>   which is a dup of
>   
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/164/false-negative-for-pylint-e0203-when-using
>   both of them about support for augment assigment. I intend to take some time
>   to work on this asap
>
> * 
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/143/spurious-unused-import-warning-when
>
>   probably easy to fix false positive when using python 3 'metaclass=' feature
>
> * 
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/24/e1002-message-for-djangoformsmodelform
>   and associated PR by Claudiu that I have to review
>
> Also, those are worth discussing, please comment on the issue if you've an
> opinion:
> * 
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/75/wrong-default-for-dummy-variables
> * 
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/99/request-that-r-flag-default-to-n
> * 
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issue/171/pylint-does-not-install-by-easy_install
>
> That would be great if all of them could be adressed before a 1.2, though if
> not in say a week, we should release anyway, no?
>

Sure, we shouldn't wait too long to release it.
_______________________________________________
Python-Projects mailing list
Python-Projects@lists.logilab.org
http://lists.logilab.org/mailman/listinfo/python-projects

Reply via email to