(For subprocess, I replied in the subprocess thread instead.)

>> You may take a look at my two following issues, but they are minor.
>> http://code.google.com/p/tulip/issues/detail?id=110
>
> This already seems checked in. What's left?

Oops, you're right :-) I forgot to update the status.

>> This bug looks more important:
>> http://code.google.com/p/tulip/issues/detail?id=109
>
> If you can review this and decide whether it can be applied I would be
> grateful. (The patch author is the FastChildWatcher author so I kind of
> trust him implicitly.)

Ok, I will try to review the patch.

Victor

Reply via email to