I had disabled buffering by default in first implementation to get simple and clean design. Do you think double buffering in transport/protocol and subprocess itself is safe?
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Victor Stinner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Does it make sense to use buffered pipes for a child process with Tulip? > > I see that BaseEventLoop.subprocess_exec/_shell sets bufsize to 0 by > default. But I would like to know if Tulip supports buffered pipes and > if it makes sense. > > Victor -- Thanks, Andrew Svetlov
