Thanks for the thorough proofreading!

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Tin Tvrtković <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been reading some more, preparing some higher level questions that
> might be used to improve the documentation. In the meantime, some more
> observations:
>
> * line 612: 'ha' should be 'has'
>

Fixed.


> * around that line, verify_mode is sometimes enclosed by double backticks
> (for monospace), sometimes not
>

Added `` around all occurrences.


> * line 618 might have an indentation problem, it renders strangely in the
> HTML (http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3156)
>

I don't see anything strange.


> * line 902: 'sigal' should be 'signal'
>

Fixed.


> * line 1374: missing a chunk of the description
>

Whoops. Added.


> * line 1426: add comma at end
>

Fixed.


> * line 1635: paragraph has two unmatched opening parentheses
>

Both fixed.


> * line 1716: 'unclocks' should be 'unblocks'?
>

Fixed.


> * line 1769: 'aqcuire' should be 'acquire'
>

Fixed.


> * line 1812: 'put_nowait' has wrong quotes (should be backticks)
>

Fixed.


> * line 1818: 'aubclass' should be 'subclass'
>

Fixed.


> * line 1900: remove ')'
>

Fixed!

>
> Cheers :)
>
>
> On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:43:18 AM UTC+1, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> Thanks! The fix should be up on the site within an hour.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Tin Tvrtković <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry if this is the wrong venue for this.
>>>
>>> Looking at http://hg.python.org/peps/file/tip/pep-3156.txt, lines 318
>>> and 881: 'stdandard' should be 'standard'.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>>
>


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Reply via email to