On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Tobias Oberstein < [email protected]> wrote:
> So I guess what I am after is "six for asyncio/Twisted" ;) Isn't "six for asyncio/Twisted" covered by the fact that you can implement one event loop in terms of another? Idiomatic asyncio code and idiomatic Twisted code can coexist on the same event loop without any single component being written to a lowest common denominator that supports both simultaneously without being idiomatic in either. There is a little work to be done at the boundaries to convert a Deferred into something that can be yielded in an asyncio coroutine or vice versa, but that seems to me to be preferable to trying to support multiple async frameworks in one package. -Ben
