Google already got back to me -- they can repro my problem and will try to
fix it.

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Yury Selivanov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yes, I can’t find anything particular about 208 (for instance) to see why
> it wasn’t exported.
>
> BTW, there is another project to migrate issues:
> https://github.com/arthur-debert/google-code-issues-migrator
>
> Yury
>
> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The Google code migration tool claims to migrate issues. You can see how
> far it got in this example repo:: https://github.com/gvanrossum/tulip-try1
> -- apparently the issue migration is flaky. :-(
> >
> > But I won't declare the package migrated until the issues and wiki have
> been migrated fully.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Yury Selivanov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Guido,
> >
> > How will we migrate issues? Just recreate them on guthub, or abandon and
> start from scratch?
> >
> > I was going to continue discussion on
> https://code.google.com/p/tulip/issues/detail?id=208
> >
> > Yury
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 1:32:40 PM UTC-4, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Because Google code is shutting down, I'm about to migrate the Tulip
> repo to GitHub. I'll post here again once the migration is done.
> >
> > --
> > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
>


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Reply via email to