Hi Martin,

Thanks a lot to contribute to improve AsyncIO toolbox.

However, before to add your library on the wiki page:
https://github.com/python/asyncio/wiki/ThirdParty
I've spotted we already have an AsyncIO library called aiotest, made by
Victor: https://bitbucket.org/haypo/aiotest/ already present on PyPI:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/aiotest

I should suggest to rename your library to avoid comprehension errors from
newcomers.

Have a nice night.

--
Ludovic Gasc (GMLudo)
http://www.gmludo.eu/

2015-05-11 22:37 GMT+02:00 Martin Richard <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to talk about a testing library I wrote on top of unittest
> called aiotest. The goal is to provide a package compatible with the
> standard unittest package, but which cuts the boilerplate when testing
> asyncio code.
>
> The code is on github here: https://github.com/Martiusweb/aiotest
>
> I use this library for a project at work, and it currently integrates the
> most common features one should need, such as :
>
>  - a TestCase class which creates and recycle the loop after each test,
> allows setUp, tearDown and test functions to be coroutine functions, and
> checks that the loop ran during a test,
>  - CoroutineMock, which allows to mock a coroutine, and modified versions
> of Mock, MagicMock which can return a CoroutineMock object instead of a
> MagicMock object when a spec or spec_set is defined and the original member
> of the mocked object/class is a coroutine function,
>  - mock.patch() are also updated so they return the enhanced Mock and
> MagickMock objects, or CoroutineMock is the patched value is a coroutine
> function.
>
> I will add the package to PyPI later this week, since It's my first
> package, I'd like to be extra careful.
>
> I am obviously open to suggestions, feature requests and bug reports!
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>

Reply via email to