Hi Paul, I've added MicroPython+uasyncio+picoweb in FrameworkBenchmarks todo-list. I'll try to do that for round 12, it's too late for round 11.
However, to have a chance for good results, it will be necessary to support multi-worker pattern. It means, create a worker like this for uasyncio: https://github.com/Eyepea/API-Hour/blob/master/api_hour/worker.py BTW, an interesting article about Nginx architecture, it's more or less the same basic principles in API-Hour: http://nginx.com/blog/inside-nginx-how-we-designed-for-performance-scale/ (I've taken the good ideas from Nginx and HAproxy internal architectures) I'll try to fork my actual worker to support uasyncio, however, I don't know if API-Hour and Gunicorn will work with MicroPython, I'll see. If you are present at EuroPython this year at Bilbao, it will be the occasion to discuss together. BTW, if somebody else wants to help, be my guest. Have a nice week-end. -- Ludovic Gasc (GMLudo) http://www.gmludo.eu/ 2015-06-21 11:09 GMT+02:00 Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]>: > Hello Ludovic, > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:20:52 +0200 > Ludovic Gasc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > It's pretty interesting. > > Thanks. > > > > > I've a question: do you test your daemons with wrk instead of ab? > > Could you test with the values: wrk -t8 -c256 -d1m ? > > I did not, for the same old reason - lack of time. uasyncio project > started more than a year ago, and for all this time, I didn't formally > announce it because I wasn't sure I did enough homework on it. So, I > decided to just "throw it over the wall" to invite wider community > review/criticism. > > And to answer your question, I selected Apache Bench because it's a > well-known, easily accessible benchmarking tool. I used another tool, > Boom (https://github.com/tarekziade/boom), but not for performance, > rather correctness testing (ensuring that data received is actually > what's expected): > > > https://github.com/pfalcon/micropython-lib/blob/master/uasyncio/benchmark/test-boom-heavy.sh > > I'll add testing with wrk to my queue, but it may take a while (because > there're bunch of other things I'm working on for MicroPython besides > uasyncio). > > > I'm interested in to integrate uasyncio and picoweb in > > FrameworkBenchmarks: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/ > > I read about them, but have to admit I didn't have a chance to review > them in detail ;-(. But I re-did and included my tests comparing > uasyncio & asyncio exactly to invite 3rd-party independent testing, so > I'd appreciate if you could add it to your queue either. > MicroPython+uasyncio should be relatively easy to install, one area > where we may be lacking is documentation. But then to improve, we'd need > independent feedback on that either. So, if/when you get to it, feel > free to ask me any questions/give any feedback (by whatever way you > like, e.g. via https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/new). > > Thanks, > Paul > > > > > Regards. > > > > Ludovic Gasc (GMLudo) > > http://www.gmludo.eu/ > > -- > Best regards, > Paul mailto:[email protected] >
