On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Martin Teichmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> Unfortunately, the problem with asyncio is, that it is in the stdlib >> and you cannot just start renaming stuff, or only with long deprecation >> periods. > > I just checked: asyncio is still on a provisional status. So one may still > change things. One should use the provisional status to make asyncio shiny. I believe provisional status assumes relative small backward compatible changes that may appear in minor python releases also (at least it is the policy for aiohttp right now). Massive renaming is not an option.
The final word belongs to Guido anyway. Personally I can live with current naming. `asyncio.create_task` as alias for `loop.create_task` may be slightly useful though. -- Thanks, Andrew Svetlov
