On 3 Jan 2013 15:19, "Jon Ribbens" <jon+python...@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +0000, Andy Robinson wrote: > > In the light of this morning's, er, entertainment, are the Python > > developers on this list (well, all but one of them...) happy with the > > way it currently works? > > No. Reply-to-list is almost never correct. There is even less excuse > than usual (which would be almost none) on a "technical" list.
I agree - I had been chortling at the hapless recruiter for hitting reply-all when she meant reply. I didn't realise that she'd actually hit reply, in the pretty reasonable expectation that it would do the same thing it does in (almost) every other circumstance. While I hope I'd be alert enough to spot the error before sending if I'd done the same, anyone I've worked with would agree that it's a 50/50 chance at best, depending on day and mania-level. > _______________________________________________ > python-uk mailing list > python-uk@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
_______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
