On 3 January 2013 23:24, Daniele Procida <dani...@vurt.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Michael <spark...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Or is he wrong about your apparent obstinate belief in your desires ? >>(I personally would have said petulant) > > That's uncalled-for. > > It would be gauche to end up trading insults over reply-to settings, and we > don't want to be gauche, do we?
Very true. I didn't view it or intend it that way, but can see how it could be. Maybe I've just seen this argument too many times. Michael. _______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
