+1 for that. Then if you don't want job ads you can filter out content with that url.
On 8 December 2016 at 15:16, Pete Graham <petegrah...@gmail.com> wrote: > How about every job posting to this mailing list has to contain an > accompanying link to the full job ad on http://pythonjobs.github.io/? If > someone forgets we can politely remind them. > > Pete > > On 8 December 2016 at 14:06, Stestagg <stest...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I agree with John >> >> While recruitment emails don't bother me directly, the debates around >> allowing them are getting quite repetitive. >> >> My vote goes on a no job adverts policy. It's not clear to me that >> enforcement will be difficult. Do we really think that the pyuk recruiters >> will not honour this? >> >> As a side note, it would be great if http://pythonjobs.github.io/ gained >> some more maintainers and became the go-to place for job postings. >> >> Steve >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 at 13:30, James Broadhead <jamesbroadh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 7 December 2016 at 21:14, John Lee <j...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>> Having been on this list since 2004 I *think* I'm right in saying that >>> there have never been sharp words on any subject EXCEPT recruiters. >>> >>> So though I've defended recruiters here before, and posted job ads >>> myself, I think we should consider the possibility that all that's needed >>> is to not allow job ads (or not allow recruiters if you like -- but I think >>> simplicity is a virtue here). Then rogue job ads can be responded to on >>> that strictly technical basis, and there will be fewer ads to cause strife >>> in the first place. >>> >>> >>> Seconded. This issue seems to be the largest source of disharmony by a >>> wide margin, and I'd be in favour of writing up a specific rule, as there >>> seem to be many different interpretations of the status quo. >>> >>> General options: >>> 1./ No recruitment messages of any kind >>> 2./ Only developers may post recruitment messages (they must have some >>> association with the position) >>> 3./ Any recruitment messages are allowed >>> >>> Personally, I'd be in favour of #2 - it allows the community to promote >>> positions internally, but avoids recruiter-mails which seem to trigger so >>> much ire. >>> >>> As Steve pointed out, enforcement would be the next problem -- I've seen >>> this over and over on forums. Perhaps a large-ish number of list mods (10 >>> or so), and discourage enforcement-en-mass? >>> >>> >>> Finally, we need to advertise the CoC & any new rules clearly to new >>> subscribers and/or first-time posters. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> python-uk mailing list >>> python-uk@python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> python-uk mailing list >> python-uk@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > python-uk mailing list > python-uk@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk > >
_______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
