Michael Foord wrote: > Tim Roberts wrote: >> >> Well, there's an interesting issue here. Much of the new stuff you >> have mentioned has nothing to do with the Python that we know and >> love. .NET and winforms (which is part of .NET) requires managed >> code, and that means IronPython. IronPython is NOT the same as >> Python; although the language is the same, the library and the >> idiomatic usage are so very different that it's difficult for one >> person to be competent in both. >> >> > > Hmmm... that hasn't been my experience. Programming IronPython with > idiomatic Python works very well.
Perhaps the issue is more than I'm not comfortable with idiomatic .NET. I did take a semi-serious stab at working with WPF in IronPython, but it just wasn't comfortable. I am very pleased to see that an IronPython book is in the works. Because I think WPF is one of the most exciting things to come out of Microsoft in a very long time, I will be among the first in line. -- Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. _______________________________________________ python-win32 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
