Larry Bates wrote:
Michel Claveau wrote:
Not a question. Only a little note... (for readers without Sunday
activity)
...
If you have a tuple and want to return it, just return it: return vret
If you want to wrap objects in a tuple to return it, I would recommend
using the build in tuple() command as the parenthesis can be
confusing: return tuple(111,222,333).
The reason return (vret,) works is because it is the same as: return
tuple(tuple(111,222,333) (the trailing comma is the key here and is
what tells python you mean a tuple instead of the "normal" parenthesis
meaning.
May seem inconsistent, but I don't believe it really is.
Well, regardless of his typos, there is clearly at least ONE
inconsistency here, in that returning a tuple behaves differently in the
COM and non-COM cases. Returning a scalar or a list works the same in
both cases.
I don't know whether that's a well-documented side effect of some other
process, or if it is a bug, but it is inconsistent.
--
Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
_______________________________________________
python-win32 mailing list
python-win32@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
