"Tony Cappellini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, I feel that Python already has too many GUI toolkits available, and > could stand to use some consolidation.
Yes this is true 8<------------------------------------------- > I actually would rather see new any new GUI-related development efforts > going into a community-standardized RAD IDE (aka Delphi-like) environment, > as opposed to a seeing a new toolkit/framework come into existence. I have > been hoping a company like Microsoft or Google would get behind this effort, > more Google than Microsoft. > Since I am an advocate for wx, I would really prefer company-backed > resources put into a completed Delphi-like IDE for wxPython. > This is exacly what Boa is, and its already usable today. It takes care of all the sizer stuff too - you can merrily forget your hard won knowledge and get on with coding the app, instead of spending time hassling with arcane GUI rules and regulations. And the help works reasonably well, as it integrates the python and wxpython documentation. > > I applaud your efforts Thomas whatever the outcome. I know they will benefit > the Python community. +1 - where would we have been without ctypes? Back to this thread - has anybody used the new pythoncard stuff? I seem to remember a thread a while ago on clp about new wine in old bottles - I have never used pythoncard, but it sounded as if it could be a viable alternative for Boa - but it needs someone to comment who knows both the systems. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ python-win32 mailing list python-win32@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
