Hi Mark, On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Mark Hammond <skippy.hamm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, No problem. > Is it possible to just have 'setup.py bdist_egg' do the right thing without > the new setupegg.py? It may be difficult. Avoiding the setupegg.py is no issue, but then it forces you to use setuptools in setup.py, which you may not want. A lot of things are changed, like how the sdist is generated from the VCS - I personally find this very annoying (this exact behavior can be bypassed through hacks, though). You would also need to check that all your distutils commands work correctly with setuptools. But if you prefer everything in setup.py despite those shortcomings, I can prepare a patch without setupegg.py David _______________________________________________ python-win32 mailing list python-win32@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
