Sorry for the belated response. Your email somehow ended up in my Spam folder.
My concern with 64bit platform derived from the fact that one software for 32bit might not work properly when recompile and run on 64bit system. There are work to be done to make sure that it work properly on 64bit and that might mean some code will need to be ported. Thanks for your input. ________________________________ From: Tim Roberts <t...@probo.com> To: Hung Nguyen <hwn...@yahoo.com>; Python-Win32 List <python-win32@python.org> Sent: Mon, November 16, 2009 11:52:39 AM Subject: Re: [python-win32] Python for Windows extensions Hung Nguyen wrote: > >Back to the questions, again thank you for the short answer. I am wondering if >you have a "longer" answer? :) > >Another piece of information I am looking for is how mature the extension is >in term of supporting python 3 and 64bit? Are you aware of any well known >products that use the extension in general and on 64bit platform in >particular? Python itself has been running on 64-bit systems for quite a long time. There aren't likely to be issues there. And remember that the 64-bit Windows API is essentially identical to the 32-bit API. They're the same functions, in DLLs with the same names. As long as one has not done anything egregiously stupid, the conversion is mostly just a matter of recompiling with the cross-compiler. What I'm saying is that there really aren't any compelling reasons for it NOT to be solid. -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
_______________________________________________ python-win32 mailing list python-win32@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32