On Oct 16, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Michael C <mysecretrobotfact...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Supposed by using Openprocess and VirtualQueryEx, I have the locations of all > the memory the application is using, wouldn't this to be true? > > Say, a 8 byte data is somewhere in the region i am scanning. Ok, I know by > scanning it like this > for n in range(start,end,1) > > will read into another variable and mostly nothing, but unless a variable, > that is, one number, can be truncated and exist in multiple locations like > this > > double = 12345678
You keep using the word "double". A "double" is a floating-point number. Are you actually referring to an 8-byte integer? > 123 is at x001 > 45 is at x005 > 678 is at x010 > > unless a number can be broken up like that, wouldn't I, while use the silly > 'increment by one' approach, actually luck out and get that value in it's > actual position? I can't tell what your x001 notation is trying to say. If you have the decimal value 12345678 stored somewhere in memory in a 64-bit value, the consecutive bytes in memory will look like this: 4E 61 BC 00 00 00 00 00 If you actually mean the floating point value 12345678.0, it will be stored in 8 bytes like this: 00 00 00 c0 29 8c 67 41 It will take you forever to search another process 8 bytes at a time. You're probably going to want to fetch a page at a time and scan the page locally. — Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. _______________________________________________ python-win32 mailing list python-win32@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
