Justin correct me i am wrong, 1. From my understandings, pyinstaller will make a executable package (which i want to avoid). 2. Can you explain for is there a detailed explanation anywhere. Bcoz i never used pyinstaller. 3. In my studio production systems are having 32 and 64 bit OS. Today we tried locally on development systems with different bits ver of Python. Application was developed in 64 bit. compiled and placed the application files (.pyc) and the dependent modules (like PyQt4, mysql connector, win32, etc) and paths are set. when i launched it on the original developed system. it worked from serve too, but when it comes to other development system with python 32 bit. we faced problems at imports of PyQt and win32 modules.
as you mentioned in one of ur reply "*If you at least have python installed on the clients, Im sure a network location for PyQt would work fine*" So do i need to place both 32 and 64 bit PyQt and win32 modules on server and depending on the python application bit i need to set the path...? On Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:31:15 PM UTC+5:30, Justin Israel wrote: > > Use pyinstaller to package just the python environment. Make the entry > point a wrapper python script that sets up the sys.path to point at the > server network locations of your actual project. > Then when your app runs, it will use the live production location instead > of the bundled code. You can update network code and everyone will pick it > up at next launch. I have an app that does this at my studio as well. > > > On Sep 26, 2012, at 11:28 PM, PBLN RAO <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Justin, > > You understood me correctly. > > Previously I tested the PyQt and mysql modules from a server on network, > and they worked perfectly. > > But the only thing is installing python on every client system is the > challenge. Because we have nearly 2000+ systems in which we need to > install. Which is a hectic task for sysadmins to do. That's the reason we > opted for a network python. > > Any how thx for the help. > > If you have any alternates let me know. Mean while i will also try any > other alternates. > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:54:55 PM UTC+5:30, Justin Israel wrote: >> >> I am not certain how windows behaves in this situation, but I know on osx >> or linux you can have python installed on the network and run scripts from >> that interpreter, which would pick up PyQt in its site-packages. >> You would have to see if windows doesn't complain about running python >> from a network location. Otherwise, pyinstaller might be your best option >> if you dont want python installed locally. It will create a standalone exe >> (which you said you didnt want). >> If you at least have python installed on the clients, Im sure a network >> location for PyQt would work fine. >> >> On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:06 AM, PBLN RAO <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> we have developed an application which is a portable version and in a >> stage to deploy. >> >> we are planning to keep the copy (all .pyc) in server and give shortcuts >> to end user to use it from server. >> >> the client systems will not have python and pyqt installed locally. >> >> so how can we deploy this app in server so that all of them can access >> without installation process or making it a .exe. >> >> -- >> view archives: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya >> change your subscription settings: >> http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya/subscribe >> >> -- > view archives: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya > change your subscription settings: > http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya/subscribe > > -- view archives: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya change your subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/python_inside_maya/subscribe
