Well, if it makes anyone feel better, Luma is doing quite well at the moment, and won't be going anywhere anytime soon!
Having said that, though... we would love to have > It’s as much of a risk as it is depending on anything open source, I > suppose… > > Sounds reasonable! But honestly I was thinking less about maintenance and > such but more on legal consequences, guarantees etc….like some sort of > (perceived) > warranty you might be having with an *official* API !?….don’t know for > what and how, but it seems like basic business logic to operate the thing > you bought for lots > of money according to manufactorer’s instructions to not lose any > warranties/arguments!? > Not really sure what you're hoping for here. As far as I'm aware of, Maya usage itself comes with no legal guarantees, so Pymel is no different there. will continue to be maintained as long as Luma exists and is using Maya >>> >>> ..I hope this is not true. Studios come and go and studios find new >>> solutions to solve their needs every day. When Luma goes something pops up >>> to replace their need for Maya, I’d expect a set of volunteers to step in >>> and continue to maintain it and provide updates. >>> >>> If not, then I’d worry. >>> >> Perhaps I should have said, "for at LEAST as long as". On that note, though - it may make people feel more comfortable to know that Luma is currently doing quite well, and won't be going anywhere anytime soon! If something unforeseen DID happen, though, as Marcus notes, I'm sure we'd be able to find some people willing to step in. - Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Programming for Autodesk Maya" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/python_inside_maya/CAAssL7ZwbVacCMG5aS_DtuBsVycmd8k%3DeTd0Hw8Mbfg9n-nLHg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
