I agree too.

Based on limited knowledge of what you’re up to, here’s how I might have
expected it to look.

from rigbuilder import skeleton
skeleton.build()


   - No acronyms
   - package and modules are included in how you read the code
   - functions for verbs (classes for names of things)

Personally, I might name my package something more interesting and less
generic than “rigbuilder”. Like “flame” or “panzar”.

from panzar import skeleton
skeleton.build()

Putting a name on it adds personality and flavour but perhaps more
importantly enables other rig builders with different personalities and
flavours to coexist with yours. Just a thought!
​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Python Programming for Autodesk Maya" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/python_inside_maya/CAFRtmOB%2B4KcahEqbpFwfE54T1LzL9ug6%2Bgf%2B%2BJvxfj3%2BLBLNCg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to