> It could be of use but personally I would prefer to use ctypes because I > find it much faster and easier to develop the module in Python than > C/C++/SWIG, and for users of the module it is easier to read the > Python code > to understand how it works. Thanks also for the reminder that the name > "wincerapi" is already taken.
By all means, feel free to reuse the name and declare the code in pywin32 obsolete! Its been a few years since I've had the CE tools, and hence I suspect since wincerapi has been built or used. I'd be just as happy to have it in the CVS attic as have it in a perpetual limbo (kind of like a bit-part character in a B-Grade movie :) I'm certainly inclined to agree about ctypes being preferable to SWIG, and as Thomas and I have vaguely and briefly discussed, I'm always open to that being an option for pywin32 itself. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ PythonCE mailing list PythonCE@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
