Sorry. That would be ucs4 vs ucs2. Never post to a mailing list drunk or risk confusing obscure Unicode protocols with obscure pyqt tools. Learn from my mistakes.
Sent from my iPad On May 16, 2012, at 12:24 AM, Brad Friedman <b...@fie.us> wrote: > MoCo eh? You may want to look into cython. It's a good complimentary tech. I > find that looking for binary releases of python.net is futile. I do the > equivalent of static compiling into my projects. > > Even if you get the right python version... 32 vs 64? Pyuic 2 vs 4? Too > many variables. > > If you do the "right thing" and listen to supported version info, you can't > get a single module built binary compatible between RHEL linux's python, and > autodesk Maya's statically linked python. Why should python.net work without > compiling separate versions too? > > Once you accept that c python isn't binary compatible with itself, compiling > python.net into your apps and environment makes a lot more sense. > > You might also consider RPC approaches. Pickle works in both. I've considered > looking into pyro to communicate between cpython and iron python as well. I > keep coming back to python.net though. > > On May 15, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Kenny Koller <kenny_kol...@bio-rad.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently trying to access both a managed and unmanaged DLL. The former >> gives me access to a high resolution encoder via USB and the latter our >> motion control system also via USB using ctypes. >> >> I'll need to mix this kind of this often during our development cycle and >> I'm looking for a long term solution. >> >> IronPython works surprisingly well but I'm not sure IronClad is quite there >> to give me access to ctypes. Also the load time is slow when running scripts >> quickly back-to-back which I do often. >> >> Python for .NET looks to be a nice solution because I can access the CPython >> stuff without worry but I find the documentation lacking and it's unclear >> how active this project is. On the documentation side I just find these .zip >> downloads but I could not find the installers that are mentioned to >> integrate with an existing 2.7 installation Python. >> >> So is this dying? Will you share with me why you are using this rather than >> IronPython? >> >> I hope this doesn't sound harsh. I think these kinds of efforts are >> fantastic. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Kenny >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet > _________________________________________________ > Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
_________________________________________________ Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
