Still no reply to this one...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: [Python.NET] Major speed change old 2.5 -> latest 2.5 build
Date:   Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:06:33 -0700
From:   Barton <bar...@bcdesignswell.com>
To:     Craig Farrow <craig_far...@sil.org>



Hi, Craig,
Would you care to attach a test script to me directly with links to any
non-standard dependancies?
Thanks,
Barton


On 7/20/2011 1:22 AM, Craig Farrow wrote:
 Barton,

 It is true that getPreload yields True in interactive mode and False
 in an application, however, that setting has no effect for me.

 In interactive mode with the old 2.5 whether Preload is set to True or
 False the db load time is just over 1 second. In the new 2.5 and 2.6&
 2.7 in both interactive mode and application mode the load time is
 between 14 and 18 seconds. Everything else is the same between runs;
 and I'm starting a fresh session for each test.

 Thanks for your help,

 Craig.

 18/07/2011 2:47 a.m. dï, Barton pišdimiš:
 Sounds like you are running in the interactive mode; ie opened python
 session interactively in a command prompt and typed

 import clr

 In which case;

 help(clr) # would yield:

 Help on module clr:

 NAME
     clr

 FILE
     (built-in)

 DATA
     AddReference =<CLRModuleFunction 'AddReference'>
     FindAssembly =<CLRModuleFunction 'FindAssembly'>
     ListAssemblies =<CLRModuleFunction 'ListAssemblies'>
     getPreload =<CLRModuleFunction 'getPreload'>
     setPreload =<CLRModuleFunction 'setPreload'>

 The Preload flag is set to True in interactive mode. Its function is
 to load the entire namespace of the default assemblies into the
 interpreter's namespace (mostly for debugging).

 Please confirm that

 clr.setPreload(False)

 clears up your concern.

 Thank you
 -Barton

 On 07/03/2011 11:39 PM, Craig Farrow wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm accessing a database through a .NET DLL and I noticed that the
 initial open/load function is taking 20 times as long in Python.NET 2.6
 as it is in my Python.NET 2.5.

 When I went to check on what 2.5 version I was using I found a newer
 one
 on sourceforge; well using pythonnet-2.0-alpha2-clr2.0_py25.zip is
 giving the same slow speeds as the 2.6&  2.7 versions I was trying. The
 2.5 that is giving me fast times (0.8 - 1.2 seconds) versus (18-24
 seconds) I got a few years ago in a package called
 'pythonnet-2.0-alpha2.zip' that contained directories for 2.4&  2.5,
 UCS2&  UCS4; the Python.Runtime.DLL is dated 6 Sep 2007.

 Any idea why the speed difference? And is it possible to get back to
 the
 fast version for 2.6&  2.7?

 I'm running Windows 7, 32 bit.

 Thanks,

 Craig.


 _________________________________________________
 Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet@python.org
 http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet





_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet

Reply via email to