i'm still new with ironpython, along with using python 2.7, platformio,
pyserial, pyvisa.
I am an EE who cross trained into MS .NET programming from embedded
micro-controller systems development and manufacturing.
I primarily use python on embedded linux systems such as beaglebone black,
raspberry pi, seeeduino arch.
although i also have netduino devices running MS .NET micro framework.
does python.net run on .net micro framework?
thanks
Ron
“The desire that guides me in all I do is the desire to harness the forces of
nature to the service of mankind.
”Nikola Tesla“Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World” (Modern Mechanix &
Inventions, July, 1934)
On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:37 AM, Tony Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Adam,
from my point of view it'd be great to have more people involved. I've been
doing some development, but more or less out of necessity (I enjoy working on
the project when I can, but don't really have the time to commit to it much
more than I have been unfortunately).
To give you some background around why there's the renshawbay repo as well as
the main repo; Initially I created the renshawbay repo as there were various
changes I needed to make to the project while it was hosted in sourceforge, and
for me it was easier to manage that in github. I added Python 3 support, and
later some stuff around subclassing .net classes in Python. It was then decided
to move the project to github, so we created the pythonnet repo directly from
the sourceforge repo rather than fork the renshawbay repo. The thinking back
then was that we should do a 2.0 release based off that fork, and then once
that was stable look at merging in the Python 3 work from the renshawbay fork.
So, to answer your first question - pythonnet/pythonnet is the official repo,
but most new development (new features etc) has taken place on the
renshawbay/pythonnet fork in the python3 branch (which maintains support for
Python 2).
There's no official roadmap that I'm aware of. There are some issues and
milestones in the github repo, but AFAIK no one is actively working on those
right now. There are only a couple of issues remaining for the 2.0 release
however.
Pull requests to the official repo are reviewed and merged by the project
owners (of which I'm one). So far those have been bug fixes or changes
necessary for the 2.0 release. I keep the renshawbay fork up to date with any
commits to the main repo.
For what it's worth, here's what I'm aware of that needs attention: -
Finalizing and releasing to PyPI the 2.0 release for Python 2.x only -
Testing and getting the renshawbay python3 branch working on non-windows
platforms (the linux build currently has problems, and I've not tested any mac
builds) - Merging the renshawbay python3 branch into the main pythonnet fork
- Updating the docs
If you're able to help at all that would be much appreciated.
Best regards,Tony
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:08 AM Tribble, Brett <[email protected]> wrote:
Adam, I’m ecstatic that there’s a player out there who is making good use of
Python.net, and who would like to help contribute. Organizational and
logistical issues aside, I’m all for anything you can throw at the project!
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe Brian Lloyd has largely yielded
this project to Tony and the community. Based on Brian and Tony’s past posts,
I’m fairly sure they’ll welcome any and all contributions to the project. It
may sound sacrilegious to some, but I would love to see the PTVS
(https://pytools.codeplex.com/) folks get involved with the project. They’re
turning out a solid product, and this fits solidly in with what Microsoft is
trying to do with PTVS, .NET Core, Azure etc. From: PythonDotNet
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Brad
Friedman
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:36 PM
To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ... I'll chime in and say the
lack of these kinds of legitimate "stake-holder" systems and responsibilities
has forced me to turn away from depending my work on this project. I still keep
up on it in hopes that it will turn around. If a legitimate player were to
step up and contribute to a responsible, active and stable future for the
project, I'd likely reconsider my stance and begin active support again. It's
hard to justify putting much into it as one guy with limited resources. It
needs full multi-platform release and development support both as a python
module and a .net embedding toolkit, both for Python 2.x and 3.x. That's a lot
of work to commit to getting set right and maintaining.
On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello all, We are usingPython.NET at BlueMountain to interface between our
large .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory
computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas
library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library
(https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).To state the obvious, the
project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain has an interest in making sure
the library doesn’t languish. To that end, we’re interested in contributing to
the project in terms of manpower and possibly funding development. I’d like to
get a better sense of a few things: - is there a BDFL … is Brian Lloyd still
active; or is Tony Roberts steering the ship (being the top code contributor
recently on github?) It looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work
is happening on on renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the
official repo?- who manages releases to PyPI?- is this PythonDotNet mailing
list the appropriate clearinghouse for all discussions related to the project?-
are there other institutions that are public users of this project?- is there
an official vision or roadmap for future releases? I see that python 3.x
support looks like it’s happening on renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other
wish-list items or proposed contributions, is it best to start opening issues
on the pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed? I’m also
wondering if there’s any collective / documented knowledge about the inherent
limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where development resources are
needed? Best, Adam
_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
