Begin forwarded message:
From: Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 January 2005 14:36:16 GMT
To: Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Collaborative pyObjC development
On 26 Jan 2005, at 12:56, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jan 26, 2005, at 7:24 AM, Pete wrote:
What's wrong with using http://pythonmac.org/wiki ? I think a Plone site is a bit much.Well you have the possibility of developing and sharing Plone Archetypes as well man.
My feeling right now for new development : start with a new web-based app that suits all clients-platforms, then build it 'properly' using pyObjc clients and decent native widgets. Diversity is to be encouraged and code sharing with others is very good here too. You never know, somebody might make a Plone App. that will perform the py2App function as a web service.
Sounds like a lot more than "setting up a Plone site". If you build it, it might get used, but I wouldn't hold your breath. The wiki is used mostly in a read-only context as-is.
Do you have any examples of projects that actually work like that to develop non-web applications? I'm not aware of any projects that use such a development strategy.
-bob
No Bob
It think (hope) it is a new and therefore untried and untested strategy. The thing is the start-up cost is pretty low, my Plone site has two instances - so at least one for long-running tasks. It costs me less than $30 per month, how many users that can support I don't know. Probably only a smallish team.
-Pete
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
