On Apr 4, 2005, at 11:00 PM, Lee Cullens wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Lee Cullens wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:20 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
I had the wxPython 2.5.3.1 binary in /Applications/Python-2.3/Extras/wxPythonExtras and when I installed Bob's new 2.4 Python I downloaded the new 2.5.4.1 wxPython binary and installed it in /Applications/Python-2.4/Extras/wxPythonExtras.
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:12 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
Probably everybody else knows this already, but I'll mention that under OS 10.3.8 I'm now happily running Python 2.4.1 with wxPython 2.5.4.1. (I had a hard time getting wxPython built -- wouldn't have gotten it at all without lots of help from Robin Dunn -- but anyone who knew what he or she was doing wouldn't have any trouble.) The two *seem* to be playing perfectly happily together.
I'd love to see a binary distribution for this. Building wxWidgets/wxPython is painful and slow. I build a lot of stuff, but wxPython is something I'd rather have someone else deal with..
Hopefully the Python 2.4.1 distribution I put out is enough of a catalyst to get their wheels turning :)
The /Applications/MacPython-2.4 folder is in no way special. If wxPython works, you're not using the Python 2.4.1 interpreter. Those binary distributions were built for Python 2.3 and *will not* work with Python 2.4, even if they were in the right place.
With what little I've done with it yet the setup seems to work. If I'm working in my home project area, I set the wx.pth to the version I want to be sure (I've only set it to the older version when I was checking out SPE).Forgot to mention I installed both the ansi and unicode binaries of each (because didn't know what I needed) and all four play well so far.
The Jaguar builds won't be used by anything you have installed.
As for the Panther builds, whichever one you installed last, wins.. but only for Python 2.3.
-bob
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
