On Apr 22, 2005, at 9:39 PM, Larry Meyn wrote:
On Apr 22, 2005, at 9:08 AM, has wrote:
I'm not sure how useful HFS path conversion options will really be; it seemed an idea to put it in for completeness' sake, but perhaps it's just overkill?
There are still some scriptable applications that only deal with HFS paths, so I would vote for including conversion options if it's no too much trouble. However, the need will decrease with time. (Although I think KaleidaGraph may never get upgraded scripting abilities.)
Does it really take HFS paths as strings, and not FSSpec? Even if it did, wouldn't a FSSpec be coerced to a HFS path string along the way?
I'm really not sure you ever really need or want to use HFS path literals, anywhere, ever, anymore.
-bob
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
