On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Bob Ippolito wrote: > MacPython 2.4.1 looks in the site-packages directory embedded in its > framework. There is only one supported framework location (/Library/ > Frameworks), so there's no need to care about alternatives.
Frameworks can also appear in application bundles too, though it may not be the case with the Python 2.4 framework. It seems like the /Library/Python system is a better one to standardize on, since it mirrors the way that a lot of other software is installed on the mac. (e.g. /Library/Java). Also, it seems strange to install into a framework that doesn't exist. Maybe the 2.4 installer should just be a separate package, then. > If you build the installer with py2app's bdist_mpkg, you don't have to > care about these details, because it does the right thing. What do you mean? Nick _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
