Hi Justin, On Jan 29, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Justin Mitchell wrote:
> On 1/29/06, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jan 29, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Justin Mitchell wrote: >> >>> I did attempt to use 0.3 and got errors. I'll attempt to diagnose >>> those after I figure out whether it's even meant to be used or >>> not.... >> >> Try it with the release version and see if it works. >> > > There are a few things that I've had trouble with, such as including > wxPython, and Intel Mac OS X support. > > In regards to wxPython... py2app 0.2 doesn't automatically include the > wxPython 2.5.3 files, so I have to force it with "-p". This results in > a rather large binary (19 megs worth of wxPython stuff). I'm using > 10.4.4 and the default python/wxPython version. I tried to "-exclude" > portions of wxPython, but -exclude doesn't seem to function (or I'm > using it improperly). Have you considered using 2.6.2 instead? It will properly include the bits you need (2.5.3 is part of the "system" for Tiger, which is why I suspect it doesn't automatically get included) and you'll benefit from the numerous bugfixes since 2.5.3. > In regards to Intel support... well, my application won't run on the > Intel macs under Rosetta. It won't be until tomorrow, when I finally > get an Intel mac, that I'll know whether it is a problem with my > script, py2app, or what. If Universal Binary support works with py2app > 0.3, then it would be very valuable to me too. I'll go into more > detail regarding this later, as soon as I can properly test it. wxWidgets/wxPython 2.6.3 will have support for building the wxWidgets part as a Universal Binary, but AFAIK Python doesn't officially have Universal binary support yet (though it's a work in progress), so at this point the wxPython wrappers would still be either PPC or Intel native. Once Python does have such support, we'll release a wxPython Universal Binary to go along with it. :-) (Barring any significant unforeseen problems!) Still, I've tried several py2app bundles that include wxPython, along with several other C++ wrapper extensions, and they've all worked just fine so far under Rosetta on an Intel iMac. So there may be a way to resolve this issue without creating a Universal build. Kevin > - Justin > _______________________________________________ > Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
