(Lots of stuff about non-Universal builds of stuff and other comments from various people removed...)
Luckily for me, I'm still a good ways away from needing to actually create a standalone app. That is just my ultimate goal. If there isn't a universal build of py2app by the time that I'm ready for it, we can probably assume that there never will be. As far as I can tell, Bob is working MUCH faster than my current time scale since I'm just in the learning stages. The same thing would hold true for wxPython, which I will likely use. I still have to finish learning Python before really diving into that. And in the meantime, if I start before there is a universal build, people who have Intel Macs (not me at the moment) will just have to run under Rosetta. I expect they will probably never notice the difference for the kinds of things I'm likely to be doing. As for the comment about not knowing how to build a standalone application that installs Python... Well, unless I'm horribly mistaken, this is exactly what py2app on the Mac and py2exe does under Windows. I'm assuming there is a Unix equivalent as well. Based on the discussions I've seen on this list, I can't come up with any reason I would want to use the Apple supplied version of Python rather than having my application include it. There is always application size, I suppose, but I don't think that will be a major issue for me. -Rodney _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
