> I'm not all that optimistic that it will be ready that soon, or > look&feel very Mac-ish.
I don't care about that -- I don't use the built-in widgets anyway. I use Java for UI largely because (1) widgets built from Swing will run in applets as well as in apps, and (2) because the graphics model is cairo-rich. The last time I looked at wxWindows, it didn't satisfy either of these criteria. Perhaps for a future project. See http://www.parc.com/janssen/pubs/TR-05-3.pdf for more than you want to know about my application. > What you have now > will most likely break if the user upgrades OS-X, as Apple is likely to > upgrade their python I don't care. That's a rare enough occurrence, and understood by users to be a big enough occurrence, that no one blinks an eye if I tell them to re-install if they do that. > I'd like to be able to build a "Python Runtime" that included all of the > Framework build, plus the full set of modules that I need for my apps. > then I'd like to be able to run command line apps against it, and use > Py2Applet (no, it doesn't exist), to build Application bundles that > relied on that runtime. This seems to me to be a good solution for > folks like us that are distributing not one app, but a bunch of apps > that all depend on the same stuff. Yes, I agree, that's a good idea. I'd probably still rely on the system Python for my particular application, because it don't need the latest and greatest version of Python, but I suppose there are applications that might. Bill _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
