On 25-mrt-2006, at 19:41, Russell E Owen wrote: > At 6:35 PM +0100 3/25/06, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >>>> On 23-mrt-2006, at 19:24, James Boyle wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> I am running OX 10.3.9. I installed python 2.4.2 using Universal >>>>> MacPython 2.4.2.dmg. >>>>> ... >> >> The universal binary build contains some trickery to enable >> building extensions >> on OSX 10.3.9 even though the default compiler flags contain items >> that don't >> work with gcc 3.3. Appearently he's running into problems. >> >> I'll be working on a universal build of python 2.4.3c1 after >> dinner, and will look >> into this problem as well. > > Would it be easier to have separate installers for 10.3.9 (not > universal binaries) and 10.4.x (universal binaries, gcc 4 required)?
I'd prefer to have 1 installer for python on OSX, that makes support a lot easier. Ronald > > -- Russell _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
