On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Jordan Mantha wrote: > Ok, so I recently got my first mac, an Intel iMac (17") for work. > So far I have been totally impressed. I really enjoy OSX and starting > to get into Python more. However, I'm starting to feel bad that I > have this thing and I'm not helping with testing/building Universal > packages for other people to enjoy. I'm particularly interested in > scientific python packages (scipy and friends, matplotlib, pyx, etc.) > and wxpython. Is there a general place to find tutorials or something > on creating Universal python packages? I'd like to help fill in > http://pythonmac.org/wiki/UniversalPackages if I can. How would I go > about doing that?
The packages on that list are "unfriendly" in that they will not trivially compile universally. Getting those packages up to universal snuff is probably best left for the people who are already familiar with the peculiarities of those packages and the nuances of OS X porting and universal binaries. Most other packages should compile trivially out of the box. However, if you have a LOT of free time on your hands and you're interested in the ugly details you'll want to read up on: 1. the lipo command 2. the -arch and -isysroot flags to cc 2. the -syslibroot and -arch flags to ld. The universal build ships with a Makefile that tells distutils what to do, but anything with external dependencies will need those dependencies compiled by hand with custom environment variables to produce a universal static or dynamic library out of them. Sometimes it's trivial, other times not (especially if it does something stupid like endian or CPU detection at ./configure time) and you may have to compile PPC then i386 and lipo the result together (which may require a separate machine for each architecture). -bob _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
