On May 9, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 9-mei-2006, at 18:02, Christopher Barker wrote: >> >> Which brings up a question. Is it possible to build universal >> binaries >> with gcc 3.*? I'd love to see a Universal SciPy package! > > I don't know if it is directly possible, but at the very least you > could do the 'build intel binary', 'build ppc binary' and 'glue > them together using lipo' dance that Apple describes in several > documents. With some luck Apple's gcc 3.* port at > opensource.apple.com already contains the code that allows you to > use multiple -arch flags, that would make building universal > binaries trivial. > > BTW. Does gcc 3.* work at all on OSX/intel?
gcc3.3 works fine on OS X Intel, but only if you give it -arch i386. The Xcode one doesn't ship with an i386 cc1. $ gcc-3.3 -o tmp tmp.c gcc-3.3: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file or directory -bob _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
