David Warde-Farley wrote: > I think this means that the Universal scipy binaries offered on > pythonmac.org are quite broken.
Yes, they are -- or at least very limited. Is it that hard to make a binary to put up (OK, two - one for PPC, one for Intel), once you've gotten it all built? At least a few people have gotten it going recently. Could someone please make them available? I understand one of the issue is that you need gfortran libs in /usr/local/... and perhaps some other stuff scattered about. Ideally, we'd figure out a way to move all these under the Python tree, but in the meantime, if you can't take all that and put in in one .mpkg, maybe a tarball would do -- something that people could just unpack and get a working system. By the way, my idea of a working system is: python 2.5 (I'm still on 2.4, but if someone is putting effort in, they might as well do the latest) latest numpy latest matplotlib latest wxPython All working together! This really makes OS-X look bad a platform. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
